Lots and lots of pro-Trump Americans and individuals who love this nation and everything it stands for are growing more and more concerned as we barrel toward Election Day, which takes place next Tuesday. Why the anxiety? Well, just look at the usual response by liberals when they lose anything, especially to former President Donald Trump. Remember the Black Lives Matter riots? How about the fact Trump has had two attempts on his life during this cycle?
Quite frankly, a lot of us are worried that if liberals lose, the left will begin preparing for war against Americans who are dead set against turning this country into a socialist dystopian nightmare. Propagandists in the media and left-wing politicians have convinced a large swath of mentally unstable individuals that Trump is going to govern like a dictator and take people’s rights away, despite having the example of his previous administration which clearly demonstrates otherwise.
Here’s what the always interesting and insightful Tyler Durden of Zerohedge has to say about the very real possibility of widespread violence following a Trump victory next week:
As I write in my forthcoming book Disappearing the President, Democratic Party research and media reports show that many senior party officials and operatives are preparing for the possibility of a Trump victory. Accordingly, planning is focused on undermining the incoming president with enough violence to rock his administration. Prominent post-election scenarios forecast such widespread rioting that the newly elected president would be compelled to invoke the Insurrection Act. With some senior military officials refusing to follow Trump’s orders, according to the scenarios, the U.S. Armed Forces would split, leaving America on the edge of the abyss.
By vilifying Trump as a despotic madman who must be stopped before he can commence his reign of terror, the regime’s propaganda apparatus not only slanders Trump but also pre-emptively threatens the reputation, as well as the livelihood and perhaps the liberty, of current military personnel. The point is to push the military against Trump: When the time comes to act, will you stand for democracy or side with a tyrant who sees the military only as an instrument to advance his personal interests? For instance, last week the Atlantic’s editor-in-chief, Jeffrey Goldberg, quoted former Trump administration officials claiming that the Republican candidate is contemptuous of America’s armed forces and, according to Trump’s former chief of staff, John Kelly, wishes he could command the same respect that Hitler commanded from his general officers.
This is not the first time that Trump has been compared to Hitler or that Kelly, a retired Marine general, turned on his former commander-in-chief. Kelly was the key source for a story published before the 2020 election, also in the Atlantic and also by Jeffrey Goldberg, that alleged Trump had called American WWII soldiers buried in French cemeteries “suckers and losers.”
Kelly’s claim that the 45th president is a member of the pro-Hitler fan club must be judged against the fact he waited half a decade to tell anyone about it. He waited until just a few weeks before the election to disclose this revelation. Seems pretty obvious why. It’s complete and total garbage, but he’s hoping it will still hurt Trump due to the gullibility of some voters.
He wants to turn veterans particularly against Trump, however, those who served during the war on terror are going to back the candidate that is against getting our troops into pointless and never-ending foreign wars. Trump has been deeply insulted in far worse ways than Kelly’s Hitler insinuation. He’ll survive that like he did two assassination attempts.
“The purpose of the Hitler narrative is not to alter the electoral preferences of left-wing media audiences already solidly in the anti-Trump column, but rather to justify taking extreme measures against the Republican candidate and the America First movement and ensure that the bulk of the military sides with the anti-Trump plot. Thus, it is best understood in the context of recent accounts promising, or urging, violence after the November vote,” Durden wrote in the article.
He then stated that, “For example, last week the New York Times published a long interview with a scholar of fascism who declared that Trump is a fascist. The paper of record followed up with another long article by two Harvard professors calling for mass mobilization in the event of a Trump victory. The proposal suggests that private industry join civil society organizations to ostracize Trump and his supporters and engage in large public protests to provoke a crisis. Kamala Harris herself, commenting on Kelly’s allegations in the Atlantic story, claimed that her opponent ‘is a fascist’ during a CNN town hall.”
Leftists are also pushing a narrative that Trump will contest the results of the election if he, by some nightmare, loses to Harris. Again, they are just trying to get people all riled up and ready to lose their minds if Trump wins. It’s all an attempt to convince folks Trump’s a dictator and a fascist, a word most liberals can’t even spell, let alone define.
This is where the political violence cultivated by the destructive Left is leading: blood-soaked streets and a divided military. The purpose of the Hitler narrative is to force members of the military to turn against Trump. After all, loyalty to the constitution means fighting Hitler, not obeying his orders.
With the two recent attempts on Trump’s life, we’ve seen how the regime’s narratives simultaneously create the conditions for violence and explain it away. When Trump was shot at a rally in Butler, PA, Democratic Party officials and the media not only denied any connection between the shooting and their inflammatory rhetoric but even blamed Trump himself. After all, he and his aspiring assassin were cut from the same cloth: “The gunman and Trump, at their opposite ends of a bullet’s trajectory, are nonetheless joined together as common enemies of law and democracy,” wrote David Frum in, of all places, the Atlantic.
And if violence does break out, take a wild stab who the left will blame for it? Trump. They will not take responsibility for the fact they fed the beast for years and years, particularly during the final months leading up to the election. No, they will say it was Trump’s rhetoric. That he’s even to blame for the assassination attempts on his own life.
“On this view, Trump has polarized the country so profoundly that he is ultimately responsible for the attempt on his own life. But that is another inversion of reality, tailored to suit the bloodlust of a dark regime. It is the logic of terror: It is only the violence of our victims that drove us to slaughter them,” Durden said in conclusion. “This self-serving logic not only gets the Left off the hook for past depredations; it serves as the pretext for future violence against Trump, his aides, and his supporters. After November 5, this weaponized narrative could be expanded to justify violence on a mass scale designed to break the republic.”
"*" indicates required fields